Monday, August 25, 2014

Breaking Out of the Status-Quo by Paul Mashote





Historically, one or more persons have always strived to break away from the circle of complacency and unsatisfactory conditions of life. Although there is an innate desire to change in some people but they are either hindered by self-inflicted or external whammy, while others are not desirous to break away from unpleasant state of affairs.
The Scripture tells us that our God is unchangeable though not static. He changes times and seasons which informs us of His love for changes. Dan. 1:21. Also, God conveyed His desire for change when He expressed a sore displeasure at the status-contentment of the Children of Israel at Mount Horeb; He ordered them to move forward as they have dwelt on that Mount too long. Deut. 1:6-7.
The record of Jesus’ conversation with the Samaritan woman at Jacob’s well, as contained in John 4, is another rich depository of biblical information worthy of the careful attention of anyone who desires to break out of the status-quo.  The Samaritan woman was used to Jacob’s well whereas Jesus came to introduce her to a divine wellspring. She was only exposed to traditional way of worshiping God on Jerusalem Mountain while Jesus came to present a better way of worshiping God wherever you are. From this, it is evident that God is dynamic in His ways and constantly encouraging status-quo break-out except from His Word. Even the New Testament of the Bible reflected breaking away from some of the shadows of the Old Testament for if the first covenant had been faultless, there would have been no need for a second covenant to replace it. Heb.8:7, Col. 2:16-17.

You are in this world but you are not of this world. John 15:19
By reason of our place of birth, domicile or family breed, we have been conditioned to think and act in certain ways. Even our religious inclinations might have contributed to the settings of our minds.
It is pertinent to know that in any society, there is a status quo that is a current standard of the most popular ways of doing, thinking, and living. Apostle Paul understood this perfectly hence he admonished us no to imitate the behavior and customs of this world, but we should allow God to transform us into a new person by changing the way we think. Romans 12:2.

The status quo begins working on you from an early age, molding the way you see the world. Even if your parents understand this and are anti-status quo, they still can’t protect you from its far-reaching influence.
This leads to the vast majority of people walking around with similar mentalities. Often times, these mentalities are antiquated, limiting, and downright absurd.

*Cue from the fathers of faith….
The father of Abraham, Terah was a zealous idol worshiper but Abraham at the age of three years, knew that it was foolish to worship the sun or any other idol, but that there was a great God, who created the sun and the moon, and the whole world, who, though Himself unseen, sees everything and knows everything, and is the real King of the World, more powerful than Nimrod. And since that time, Abraham's faith in God grew stronger every day thereby breaking away from the status-quo of family idol worship. This decision made him outstanding in his generation and relevant in this and indeed future generations! Joshua 24:22.
Breaking away from the status was made possible in the lives of many who took the gauntlet of not scheming excuses for failure. They never allowed parental, communal, national or even physical disabilities to stop them from fulfilling destiny. The father of Jotham died a leper but the young man at age 25 was never devastated instead he prepared his ways before the Lord and God made him mighty! 2 Chro. 27:6. 

Also, Jephthah refused to remain in the circle of ignominy as result of his birth circumstance. His step brothers’ bemocked and drove him out his fathers’ house. He relocated from seemingly pleasure zone to a ghetto of discomfort. Jephthah eventually surpassed in excellence and became a national celebrity! Jud.11
Daniel was another hero who decided to make a U-TURN from being a captive to a first class President in a strange land, Babylon. He was one of several children taken from the comfort zone of their parents into Babylonian captivity. Daniel however dared to be different; he determined not to join others if he could not beat them. He realized where he was coming from and knew where he wanted to be hence his decision to live a blameless life made him extremely outstanding! Daniel 1:8

Jesus Christ, the author of our faith further fortified our conviction that breaking from unpleasant or generational mediocrity is possible by not allowing what stopped others from breaking forth in Nazareth to hinder him. "Nazareth! Can anything good come from there?" Nathanael asked. "Come and see," said Philip. John 1:46. Some people had attributed the cause of their failure in life to national economic disaster while others are struggling to seek greener pastures in perceived better countries. But, the good news is that you can turn your family, community or national Nazareth around if only can follow Christ’s principles. You can be the best, break new grounds and set great records which would take long to beat if you can partner with God by walking in total obedience to His commandments.

*How do I Break the Status-Quo?
To break the status-quo and get launched into the deep of overflowing greatness, you must learn from those who defied obvious limitations and environmental failures. It is also worthy of note that aspirants of unimaginable greatness must always anticipate greater works, not allowing anyone’s or their achievements to hinder them from attaining higher heights or reaching the peak no one has ever reached. Making a drastic turn from your present situation is possible if you can ruminate, meditate and act on the following pragmatic steps-

1. Believe and Receive JESUS
God has given everyone equal opportunity to re-write negative histories and become astonishingly outstanding in their generation by sending His Word (Jesus Christ) into the world. Jh.3:16. Unfortunately, countless refused in the past and many are still refusing the dynamic ability to change their lives forever! Jh. 1:10-12.
You cannot break away from the status-quo with your old mind which has been configured to think and act in a particular way. A change of mind, perception, thoughts, reasoning or way of life is key to attaining greatness in life because as a man think so is he. When you accept Jesus into your life, the first thing He will do is to change your mind as you can never break the chain of status-quo without a change of mindset made available only in Jesus.

2. Take on the Strength of God
A weightlifter’s strength is defined by the number of pounds or kilos lifted. The strength of a building is measured by its resistance to external forces exerted by wind or earthquake. The strength of a corporation is often defined by its net assets. Spiritual strength involves the power to lift burdens, a foundation deep enough to resist sinful pressures, and the security of unlimited resources.
You cannot surpass great records or set new standards of greatness by your “common sense “ or limited strength. The race is not to the swift or the battle to the strong, nor does food come to the wise or wealth to the brilliant or favor to the learned…Ecc.9:11. There is always an incomparable difference between what the strength of God can do compare to the extent human calculations, wisdom or strength can achieve. Is.40:31

3.  Be Willing and Obedient
There are no short cuts to greatness for precept must be upon precept and line upon line…Is. 28:10. You cannot break away from the status-quo if you are contented and unwilling to leave your old estate. The Bible says it only those who are WILLING, DESIROUS, EAGER, READY, EXPECTANT AND OBEDIENT shall eat the best fruits of the land! Is.1:19. Deut.28:1

 Conclusion
You should believe that breaking out of the status-quo and living a life without boundaries or limitations is God’s plan for His Children. You too can be a city without walls where uncommon exploits and greater feats would be a common place! Zach. 2:5. Refuse to lean or accept excuses for past failure. You should not settle for anything lesser than God’s Will due to physical or evil disabilities. Put your trust in God and set your affection on the one who can make you different indeed and affect your generation positively!
Dare to be different in your generation!

Paul Mashote, Esq.
+2348022737965
topshaddai@gmail.com
Follow @PaulMashote
 All Rights Reserved.

Tuesday, May 6, 2014

#BRINGBACKOURGIRLS O GOD!!!By Paul Mashote

O LORD #BringbackOurGirls like YOU did in 1Sam.30

When the Amalekites raided the Negev and Ziklag. They pugnaciously tore Ziklag to pieces and then burnt it down (That will not be our portion in Nigeria,Amen).
They captured all the women, young and old and whisked them unknown destination. They didn’t kill anyone, but drove them like a herd of cattle. By the time David and his men entered the vi...llage, it had been burnt to the ground, and their wives, sons, and daughters were all taken as prisoners.

The people were sincerely grieved and thought of STONING David for the insecurity lapse...BUT David took the following steps having cried his strenght out-

1. He Encouraged himself in the Lord!
Courage is not absence of fear but graceful boldness to confront mountains!Courage is God's graceful spirit that enables you to face danger or pain without showing fear.
In the Lord,we can find courage to confront all forms of social ills bedeviling our dear nation.#Be Courageous!

2.He Consulted God not security chiefs that may have even connived with the raiders...not foreign assistance cos he knew that vain is the help of man.Ps.108:12,Ps.60:11,Prov.3:5.
Friends,PROTEST propels responsible government to act but we must never shift our focus from God who can make THINGS happen! #InGodwemusttrust!

3. David Inquired from God not from Satelite Dish!
God knows every detail about the 234 Girls that were alledgedly abducted by the Amalekish Boko Haram insurgents!The Lord of Hosts will deliver them in Jesus name!#ChannelyourinquiriestoGod!

4.David and four hundred men KEPT UP THE PURSUIT, but two hundred of them were too fatigued to cross the Brook Besor, and stayed there.David was physically involved..We do hope that Mr.President (#GoodluckJonathan) like David would exude davidic bravery!#BEBRAVE!

5.God used an Egyptian slave of an Amalekite to orchestrate Total Recovery!
Well,thank God for the Nigerian Armed Forces,SSS,Police and other security outfits in Nigeria but the FG can't do without Divine Intelligence!God can use anything or anyone to reveal,divulge or expose the whereabouts of our beloved Chibok Girls but we are specially trusting him to deplore Angelic Armies to rescue these guiltless captives because it appears Nigerian host is helpless!

O God arise and #BringBackOurGirls Alive !in Jesus name!

Monday, April 28, 2014

Positive Political Mindset!


"We know that our economy works best when it works for all of us—not just a fortunate few. We believe we do better when everyone who works hard has a chance to get ahead." —President Obama

Watch the weekly address: http://ofa.bo/sbf

Tuesday, April 15, 2014

KEEPING NIGERIAN NATIONAL HONOURS AWARD SAFE FROM IMPUNITY BY PAUL MASHOTE,ESQ.


Every nation has a system of recognizing and rewarding outstanding achievements of its citizens and nation’s friends with the aim of promoting patriotism and diligence in every sphere of human endeavour. The National Honours was established on the 1st October 1963 and duly passed and codified in the National Honours Act, 1964. This national recognition places on record public appreciation and encomiums for the contributions of those who have distinguished themselves in their respective services to the nation. Furthermore, national recognition awards tend to motivate and challenge the citizens to strive for greater heights and to contribute more actively towards promoting the nation's intellectual, socio-economic and creative societal core values.
The National Honours Acts, LFN 2004 provides for various categories of honours and mode of appointments but however failed to state indubitably and explicitly the criteria for eligibility of such awards apart from being a citizen of Nigeria and grounds of revocation of the national honour. It is noteworthy to examine the pedigree of some of the past and recent awardees which appears to be questionable as some of them either has cases bordering on corruption charges or undischarged criminal allegations leveled against them which has further advanced the menace of impunity in the Nigerian polity. For example the former governor of Bauchi State, Adamu Muazu, who was awarded CON, has corruption charges preferred against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC). We hold that act of impunity is against international norms and standards to give a national award to someone with a case to answer on alleged corrupt practices.
In the same vein, we strongly opine that the Federal Government should put in place stricter criteria and revocation modus which should discourage corrupt minds from contemplating the national honours even if nominated.
The Nigerian National Honours, in descending order of importance, are:
  • Grand Commander of the Order of the Federal Republic (GCFR)
  • Grand Commander of the Order of the Niger (GCON)
  • Commander of the Order of the Federal Republic (CFR)
  • Commander of the Order of the Niger (CON)
  • Officer of the Order of the Federal Republic (OFR)
  • Officer of the Order of the Niger (OON)
  • Member of the Order of the Federal Republic (MFR)
  • Member of the Order of the Niger (MON)
The National Honours Act empowers the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria to make provisions for the award of honours, decorations and dignities. It established two Orders of Dignity known as the Order of the Federal Republic and the Order of the Niger. Each Order consists of four ranks; the first and highest is that of Grand Commander; the second is that of Commander; the third is that of Officer; and the fourth that of Member.
The National Committee for National Honours and Awards usually invites nominations from the office of the President, the Chief of Defence Staff, Inspector General of Police, Federal Civil Service Commission, State governments, the Chief executives of the Manufacturers Association of Nigeria (MAN) and the National Association of Chambers of Commerce, Industry, Manufacturing and Agriculture (NACCIMA). The final decision on the awards is however largely left to the discretion of the President, and the apparent criterion is meritorious and distinguished service to the nation.
Section 3 of the Honours Act conferred the power to make awards on the President. However, there had been weighty debates on whether the president should be stripped off the discretionary power to confer national awards on deserving Nigerians. Legal luminaries had argued that this presidential privilege could be abused and impunitised as this may be an opportunity for the president to reward political supporters and vituperate political opponents by depriving them of such meritorious award. The Former Governor of old Kaduna State and Chairman of the Conference of Nigeria Political Parties (CNPP), Alhaji Balarabe Musa, once said:
“The national honours award has been bastardised on political lines, friends and business associates not for the interest it was meant for. Although some merited the national honour but some are purely a political reward for friends.
“The honour should not be based on political patronage but on how people make positive changes on the lives of the people or the country.”

It is pertinent to query the rationale behind the power of the president to give or withhold his approval of nominated candidates for national awards without recourse to statutory screening by relevant anti-corruption agencies, the National Assembly and the general public to investigate and sift the shaft from the wheat amongst hundreds of honourees giving such dignifying honour only to those with corrupt-free profile, industrious revolutionists and socio-economic and religious contributors towards national development.
Section 2(1) of the Act provides that a person shall not be eligible for appointment to any rank of an Order unless he is a citizen of Nigeria. This eligibility clause appears to be the only criteria for the conferment of national honours as no provision prevents past convicts of nefarious corrupt offences or statutory provisions for revocation of such honours if honourees peradventure falls of the track of patriotism.
Also, the Nigerian National Merit Award which was established in 1979 by Act No. 53 to award prizes to citizens of Nigeria for outstanding intellectual attainment, academic performance and contribution to national development in the areas of science, technology, medicine, humanities, arts and culture and any other field considered deserving by the Board of Trustees was instituted by then Head of State, General Olusegun Obasanjo to accord recognition to outstanding and original contributions to national development.
The Nigerian National Merit Award is different from the National Honours and Awards, which are conferred on persons who have rendered meritorious service to the nation. The Merit Award is specifically designed to encourage Nigerians to be devoted to the search for solutions to the nation's problems in their various disciplines. The stated objective is to encourage Nigerians to concentrate their intellectual energies in academic work and other fields of endeavour strategic towards achievement of excellence in every sector of the nation and the world at large.
The Merit Award is administered by a Board of Trustees appointed by the President, and is largely insulated from political interference in order to ensure that it retains its enviable position as the highest national award for intellectual and academic excellence. The Board is, however, expected to take cognizance of men and women whose out-standing intellectual and academic contributions to national development have not won international accolades. Guidelines for consideration of nominees for the award are as follows:
a. The award is open to all citizens of Nigeria.
b. Selection is made from a wide range of contemporary works, which are innovative, creative, essentially Nigerian in content, and of international distinction.
c. The accomplishment (in Science and Technology), for which an award is to be made, should be qualitatively and quantitatively beneficial to the Nigerian society in particular, and to humanity in general.
d. The work should promote Nigeria's image, culture and reputation as a nation.
e. The achievement may constitute a specific breakthrough in any field, or may be of a cumulative nature.
Although, the benefits of various national awards cannot be overemphasized or dissipated but there is a dire need to check the exercise leading to this national coronation in order to circumspectly assay the profile of potential honorees bridle acts of impunities in every sector and sectional parts of the country.
In September 2012, President Goodluck Jonathan directed the National Honours Committee to     compile a list of persons conferred with National Honours whose integrity have come to question since their investiture. This directive was apparently made in deference to public opinion over the need to sanitise the national honours in view of the indictment of some of the recipients for corruption as well as the arraignment and conviction of some for fraud-related offences.
The House of Representatives Ad Hoc Committee Panel on the Near Collapse of the Capital Market, also recommended in its report endorsed by the House, stated, “That all former bank executives who are recipients of national honours and who are currently being prosecuted for crimes and unethical practices which led to the collapse of their banks be stripped of their national honours by the President and Commander-in-Chief in line with Section 7 of the National Honours Act, LFN and international norms.
It is instructive that the House did not extend this recommendation to public officers, civil servants past or present political office holders who may be
Deprivation of National Honours
Section 7 of the National Honours Act provide for the deprivation of an honour where a recipient conducts himself in a manner which the President considers to be inconsistent with the honour. It provides that if it appears to the president that after inquiry (if any) as he thinks fit, that the holder of the rank of an Order has conducted himself in a manner inconsistent with the dignity off the Order, the president may by notice in the Federal Gazette deprive him of that rank. This section had been subjected to criticisms by political analysts who posit that the president may hide under this section to either protect his political friends or witch-hunt his political opponents.
Having therefore considered the provisions of the National Awards Act, we are persuaded to propose the following pragmatic steps that can be taken to make National honours process credible and transparent.
1.      The eligibility criteria should be widely publicized and periodically reviewed. The criteria as well as nominees should be electronically accessible.
2.      The public should have a major role in nominations and government should diminish its control over who gets honoured.
3.      Serving public officers of any rank should not be eligible for the awards. Those who deserve it will be considered after they have left public office. Indeed, the Code of Conduct provisions in the 5th Schedule of the Constitution prohibit serving public officers from accepting benefits of any kind for anything done or omitted to be done by him in the discharge of his duties. This provision should apply to national honours consideration.
4.      There must be room for public objections to nominations. This means that a shortlist of nominations should be published with sufficient time to enable members of the public file objections or complaints and the process for adjudicating such objections should be clear, transparent and expeditious.
5.      There should be statutory based expeditious process for depriving undeserving recipients.
6.      The National Honours Act should be reviewed as it does not contain eligibility or explicit criteria for the qualification of the national honours.
7.      Relevant anti-corruption agencies should be allowed to scrutinize the record of nominees and their findings should be made public before ratification and confirmation by the National Assembly.


Paul Mashote, Esq.

All rights reserved.

Friday, March 28, 2014

You have to fulfill destiny!













We value you comments!

Wednesday, January 29, 2014

POLITICAL TERRORISM IN NIGERIA by Paul Mashote, Esq.

Political Terrorism in Nigeria:Cursory and Critical Appraisal
http://www.letsgist.com/columnists/political-terrorism-in-nigeria-cursory-and-critical-appraisal/

http://www.booksie.com/editorial_and_opinion/article/shote_paul/political-terrorism-in-nigeria:-cursory-and-critical-appraisal